Should a federal government construction contractor assume
that its permit request for a construction project will be approved by local
state authorities? Absolutely not, according to the United States Court of
Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The Federal Circuit found that the plain
language of FAR’s Permits and Responsibilities Clause, which was incorporated
into a Federal Bureau of Prisons contract, allocated any financial cost associated with permitting solely on the
contractor.
Bell/Heery was awarded a design-build construction contract
to build a new federal prison in New Hampshire. The project specifications
detailed a “cut-to-fill” site, meaning that the project land had to be leveled
by excavating, or “cutting” materials from one area of the work site and using
the same materials to fill lower areas. Bell/Heery’s proposal incorrectly
assumed that the local environmental officials, the New Hampshire Department of
Environmental Sciences (NHDES), would approve the cut-to-fill operations – and
as an unfortunate result, Bell/Heery had to incur approximately $7.7 million in
excess costs to perform, because NHDES did not approve the anticipated efficient
cut-to-fill operations.
Bell/Heery attempted to recover the excess $7.7 million from
the Federal Bureau of Prisons, arguing that the agency was contractually
required to engage with NHDES about the cut-to-fill specifications and that the
agency breached its duty of good faith and fair dealing by failing to engage
with NHDES, among other allegations. The Federal Circuit did not agree, citing
the FAR Permits and Responsibilities Clause, which made the contractor
responsible for all permitting costs. Contractors putting together bids for
federal government work should keep this decision in mind when pricing their
bids, to ensure that they account for the possibility of permitting roadblocks
and how these hurdles will impact their bottom line.
Katie Lipp is an attorney with the Washington, DC regional business law firm Berenweig Leonard, LLP. Katie can be reached at klipp@berenzweiglaw.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment